[Suggestion] Support WireGuard

Post a reply

:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek: :angel: :clap: :crazy: :eh: :lolno: :problem: :shh: :shifty: :sick: :silent: :think: :thumbdown: :thumbup: :wave: :wtf: :yawn:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 130 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by csw1r3 » Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:18 am

Was able to connect on macOS and iOS. After successful connection/handshake, no traffic gets routed anywhere, can't ping assigned/designated IP or DNS at or .8 or anything else. Anyone knows what may be causing this and how to fix?

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by df » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:46 pm

chrispeddler wrote:
Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:38 pm
I heard that AzireVPN also works well with Wireguard. They stared strong with no logging policy an additional security they called "blind operator mode," Anyone tested it yet?
Their blind operator mode is pretty silly, even Jason (WireGuard author) says so himself - https://archive.is/ixN9A
More info about WireGuard and our no-logging policy is @ https://cryptostorm.is/blog/wireguard-privacy-concerns

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by anonymoose » Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:55 am

WireGuard is amazing, THANK YOU!!!!

OpenVPN was a nightmare, always disconnecting on UDP and could rarely get TCP to connect (slow when it did!). With UDP Open VPN working I got about 30Mbps, I now get 60Mbps with WireGuard and it's rock solid and so simple !!!

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by AnonAsPossible » Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:59 am

For those of you trying to setup WG In Linux Mint 19.1-tessa-xfce-x64, you'll also need to install the following;

\sudo apt install resolvconf curl

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by prospav » Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:02 pm

Set up on Mac OSX 10.14.4 and using official Wireguard app from apple store, easy set up and works beautifully. Same on IOS 12.2 and apple store app.
Many thanks to CS.

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by df » Mon Apr 08, 2019 5:08 am

https://cryptostorm.is/wireguard just went live :-D
Be sure to check out https://cryptostorm.is/blog/wireguard-support-added too for info on device limits and whatnot

Like it says on https://cryptostorm.is/wireguard and https://www.wireguard.com/ -
WireGuard is not yet complete. You should not rely on it. It has not undergone proper degrees of security auditing and the protocol is still subject to change.
We've been playing with it since 2016 and it doesn't seem like the protocol is going to change significantly anytime soon, so it should be stable enough to use now.
But keep in mind, it hasn't had any proper audits, so you shouldn't be using it for high security scenarios.
If you just want better speeds for torrenting or whatever, it should be fine for that.

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by df » Tue Apr 02, 2019 8:02 pm

We're working on the interface for it now. Almost done.

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by WG_tinkerer » Wed Dec 20, 2017 11:46 am

It's bloody lovely. Set up a breeze, low over head (getting around 95% connection speed) and it handles roaming between connections flawlessly.

Makes openvpn feel very clunky indeed!

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by PrivacyActivist » Sat Sep 23, 2017 1:09 am

Hash: SHA512


This isn't ideal from a security point of view and it's only supported on Linux and Mac OS X. I think this project has a bright future, however. It needs to mature before it can be used daily and for important purposes.


Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by df » Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:23 pm

We do have a test wireguard instance up on a Romanian server, but it's unlikely that we'll provide public access to it anytime soon.

Main reason being, as the wireguard website puts it, "WireGuard is not yet complete. You should not rely on this code."

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by wireguarduser » Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:45 pm

also use it with mullvad, way higher speeds than openvpn, had some kernel warning log spam in early version, seems fine now

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by cypherpunk » Sat Sep 09, 2017 4:29 am

I have used it. The performance is really good, moderately better than OpenVPN in that if you have a dynamic IP (e.g. roaming through open wifi or mobile) it reconnects much quicker - no SIGHUPs.

It's also been confirmed working the [linux-libre](https://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/) and the [unofficial-grsec](https://github.com/minipli/linux-unoffi ... c/releases) patches. If you role your own architecture that's a big security plus.

Re: [Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by parityboy » Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:52 pm

cypherpunk wrote:WireGuard is a next generation VPN that is experimenting with post-quantum crypto. Mullvad already rolled it out and it's working great. Please consider supporting!
I know that staff are already looking at it, especially in relation to how its public key authentication fits within the Cryptostorm model.

Going by Mullvad's blog, it's still in the testing phase. Have you any personal experience of it? What's the performance like?

[Suggestion] Support WireGuard

by cypherpunk » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:29 pm

WireGuard is a next generation VPN that is experimenting with post-quantum crypto. Mullvad already rolled it out and it's working great. Please consider supporting!